Your source for news, reviews, and information... 12:31 PM Thursday, September 16, 2004  
AMDReview Site News!

Specials
Manufacturers Links
Recent Reviews
Antec Sonata Case

Asus SK8N vs SK8V

Lian-Li PC-V1000 ATX Case

BattleField Vietnam

Unreal Tournament 2004
Top Affiliates

3dgameman.com
3DXtreme.net
A1-electronics.net
AMDboard.com
Bigbruin.com
TheCrucible.ca
Datafuse.net
EXHardware.com
Fastlanehw.com
FutureLooks.com
GameSPYDaily.com
GruntvillE.com
HardOCP.com
HiTechMods.com
Hothardware.com
Insanetek.com
Lanaddict.com
Modsynergy.com
Monster-Hardware.com
NinjaLane.com
OCTools.com
Onlynewz.net
RBMods.com
SteamedTurtle.com
ShackNews.com
TechIMO.com
TekBunker.com
TechTastic.ca
TweakNews.net
ViperLair.com
Whiningdog.net













There are 4 parts to this review, please use the pulldown below to browse sections or simply hit "Next" at the bottom of each section to continue


Installation
Installation of the motherboard was pretty straightforward. The only problem I ran into was that it wouldn't initially boot. After having a brain spasm and overlooking the most obvious troubleshooting step, it took me almost an hour to figure out the problem. I started with the most obvious things (reseating the video card, removing things one at a time, etc) until I'd eventually taken everything out, removed the processor and then reinstalled everything one piece at a time. Finally, I realized I hadn't yet tried to clear the CMOS (DUH)! Once I did that, I was finally able to get into the BIOS. I took a look at the BIOS and didn't see anything amiss, so I exited out and restarted. No boot again. Getting annoyed, I went ahead and cleared the CMOS again and got back into the BIOS. I then noticed that when the setup was set to auto for the CPU and RAM, it was trying to set my FSB at 200Mhz synch, because it was reading the PC3200 RAM. I went in and manually set the system to 166Mhz (333) synch and I was able to boot up and continue installation with no further problems.

Overclocking
I was hoping for an extremely high overclock with this motherboard, since I'd heard that it could run the 200Mhz FSB without a problem. I had the RAM that could take it and I had no PCI cards to interfere with anything (not that it should matter anyway, since the PCI bus is locked at 33Mhz). Unfortunately, 200Mhz was just not in the cards for me. I've read in certain Asus forums that some people have been able to get their Asus A7N8X Deluxe systems running 200Mhz FSB synch with no problems, but I don't even get close to that. My system will max out at 180Mhz FSB synch, which gives me a total clock speed of 2.25Ghz, which is Athlon XP2800+ speed. At that FSB, I'm able to run with very aggressive RAM timings and have no issues. I could get up to 185Mhz FSB, but at that speed 3Dmark2001SE will crash to the desktop, no matter how much I loosen up my RAM timings or increase VCORE and VDIMM. I even tried lowering the multiplier, which I could do, but it still didn't help me. I was able to boot into windows at 11x190Mhz, but I couldn't run SiSoft Sandra or 3Dmark2001SE without crashing. Yes, you read the last sentence correctly, this mobo does unlock the multipliers of a factory locked CPU. At least it did in my case. I've read in different forums that this was not the case for other people though, so your mileage may vary. Honestly, I'm pretty happy with the overclock that I can get. I set the AGP at the required 66Mhz and I know that the PCI bus is running at 33Mhz, so I'm happy with the resulting increase in speed that I have. It's not running a 200Mhz FSB, but it's still pretty darn fast. The overclocking options on this board are great, but except in very rare cases this board is not for hardcore overclockers. I've heard of a few people running over 200Mhz FSB with this board, but most have either done some type of hardware mod, are running something other then air cooling, or are using modded BIOS. The bottom line is, if you want to play with overclocking a little but aren't going to shoot for the moon, this board will not let you down.

Stability
I've had this system for about 2 months now and I've had no stability issues at all. I've stressed this system as hard as I could and I've only had it lock up only one time, while I was in the BIOS with the system overclocked past the point of stability. I've run this system day and night for the entire time I've had it at 180Mhz FSB and it runs extremely stable. I've run benchmarks, games, office apps and more and this system just breezes through everything. It may not be the "fastest" system in every way, but I don't have anything bad to say about the stability of this chipset. The one thing I do want to mention is that I've had problems with the onboard 3COM NIC on my board. Several times over the last couple months, the 3COM NIC has stopped resonding out of the blue. Nothing seems to help, even a reboot of the system. I've always been able to swap to the NVIDIA NIC and contiue on, and a day or week later the 3COM NIC will function fine again. It's just disturbing to me that this happens at all. This won't affect most people, as most won't need the second NIC anyway, but if you're going to use this for a server running internal and external network connections, or if you want this board for internet connection sharing, you may want to think twice. Of course, newer drivers may take care of this in the future. If the dual NIC aspect of this board is one that interests you, make sure you do your homework on this subject.

Benchmarks
For comparison purposes, I ran the nForce2 system against my old Soyo KT333 Dragon Ultra Platinum Edition system, which is now my LAN party box. I'm including benchmarks from the Asus system with 166Mhz FSB and 180Mhz FSB settings. System specs are below:

nForce2 system
Asus A7N8X Deluxe motherboard
Athlon XP2600+ 333Mhz FSB processor
2 sticks 256MB Corsair PC3200 XMS DDR RAM
Gainward GeForce 4 Ti4600
Western Digital Special Edition 80GB 7200RPM hard drive
Onboard sound
Onboard NIC
nForce drivers v1.0, Detonator drivers v41.09, 1001.C BIOS
Windows 2000 SP3

 

KT333 system
Soyo KT333 Dragon Ultra Platinum Edition
Athlon XP2600+ 266Mhz FSB processor
512MB Corsair PC3200 XMS DDR RAM
Gainward GeForce 4 Ti4600
Seagate Barracuda ATAIV 40GB ATA100 7200RPM drive
Onboard sound
Onboard NIC
VIA 4.37a 4in1 drivers, Detonator drivers v41.09, 2ba5 BIOS
Windows 2000 SP3


As you can see, both systems are running XP2600+ processors, though the Asus system is running one with a 333Mhz bus and the Soyo system is running one with a 266Mhz bus. This is due to the limitation of the Soyo motherboard.

 












 

 

You definitely know that through SEO, your business will benefit hugely, so you have to make sure to find the right Link Building Company that can help you gain your goals SEO on lookup motor rankings, finding the best Link Building Company for your business is a lot more crucial than ever. Link building Company will help you | Simple Website Templates. Every great website and web design needs a starting place or point. Our own newly redesigned website started from a basic template that was heavily modified to suit our needs and the same can be done for you. Using our simple sea website templates on our site you can buy website templates

So what do all of those graphs mean? Well, the first thing I'd like to say is that this isn't a math equation. You can't just add up the results and come up with the better platform. It's interesting to note how close the two platforms really are. As you can see, the nForce2 platform is better at productivity software and office apps, while the two systems are very close in the gaming benchmarks (all except 3Dmark2001SE which I think is a terrible benchmark). I was quite confused to see that the KT333 system seemed to do better in most of the UT2K3 benchmarks in everything but the UTP botmatch. I was so confused I ran the benchmarks over and over. No matter how many times I ran the tests, the KT333 board holds up strongly against it's newest competitor. What these graphs don't show is my subjective results. The biggest surprise is that the older system, the KT333 system, feels just as fast in day to day use. As a matter of fact, when the system still had the GF4 Ti4200 64MB video card and an Athlon XP2000+, it felt just as fast as this newer system, which had a better video card and a faster processor. It was only in the really big UT2K3 maps that I noticed any difference at all. One really odd thing I noticed was that whenever I started the AquaMark benchmark on the Asus system, the game would "stutter" for the first few frames, then go on to smooth out. I never had that problem on the Soyo system. I'm really amazed that the old system does so well against the nForce2 system. I was expecting to be totally blown away by the performance of the nForce2 board, especially seeing the memory performance, but instead I'm left feeling a bit under whelmed. I even formatted another drive I had and installed Windows XP SP1 and tested my games under that OS, but my results were pretty much the same. I've asked questions in various forums and applied many tweaks on this system, all to no avail. It just doesn't seem to want to run any faster. Don't get me wrong, this platform is quite fast and extremely stable, but after hearing how the nForce2 boards were the fastest thing around, I just expected more.

 

For those who wonder about the benefit of the TwinBank memory architecture, check out these scores:



 

As you can see, you lose a little speed when you're not using the TwinBank Memory Architecture, but the performance is still good, even with just one DIMM. You definitely don't have to fear that performance will be horrible if you only have one stick of RAM.





Poll
In the next generation of technology, what would you buy?

PCI Express
DDR-II
BTX Format
Intel’s Dual core Tech
AMD’s 64-bit chips


[ Results | Polls ]


Market Watch
-CPU AMD
2600+ and below
2700+ and above
AMD MP
Opteron
Athlon 64

-CPU Intel
P4/XE 2.4 & up
P4/XE 2.2 & down
Celeron

-Memory DDR
-Memory pc133
-Hard Drive IDE
(60G and lower)
-Hard Drive IDE
(80G and higher)
-CD/DVD/CDRWs
-nVidia video cards
ATI video cards
-LCD monitors: 15in
-LCD monitors: 17in

AMD Motherboards
  • XP:nForce2,VIA KT600
  • Opteron: nForce3, AMD8000
  • 64: nForce3, AMD8000, K8T
  • Intel Motherboards
  • Latest Chipset: 875P
  • w/Graphics: 865G
  • VIA: P4X
  • ATI: 9100 IGP
  •  
    AMDReview Forums | - Copyright 2001-2004 AMDReview.com
    AMDReview is independently owned and operated - not affiliated with AMD

     

    Sitemap
    AthlonXP.com - Your Source for News, Reviews and Information :: Collections


    For the lesser mortals in order to convert PSD to CSS converting Psd to html is something that requires the help of designers and programmers