Test System:
- Windows XP Pro SP2
- Thermaltake Silent Pure Power 420W PSU w/Active PFC
- Gigabyte GA-K8NSNXP-939 motherboard
- AMD A64 3200+ Winchester core 90nm CPU
- GeForce4 Ti4200-8x
You definitely know that through SEO, your business will benefit hugely, so you have to make sure to find the right Link Building Company that can help you gain your goals SEO on lookup motor rankings, finding the best Link Building Company for your business is a lot more crucial than ever. Link building Company will help you | Simple Website Templates. Every great website and web design needs a starting place or point. Our own newly redesigned website started from a basic template that was heavily modified to suit our needs and the same can be done for you. Using our simple sea website templates on our site you can buy website templates I tested these modules in a Gigabyte motherboard, model GA-K8NSNXP-939. Upon powering up the first time, the system would not post. Referencing the motherboard manual, I found the cause to be an SDRAM error. Tried reseating the ram, no good. So I inserted them in single-channel configuration and that did the trick. I was puzzled so I called Gigabyte. They claimed that it was the ram, not the motherboard, but offered me a newer BIOS. I flashed the motherboard BIOS to version F4h and like magic, the ram suddenly worked perfectly in dual-channel configuration. So as it turns out, there was absolutely nothing wrong with our test subject. Many people do not realize that a simple flash to a newer BIOS can resolve conflicts such as these, but it is quite common, so if you run into the same type of issue, make sure you are using the latest BIOS from the motherboard manufacturer.
The chips on these modules are manufactured by a company called Mosel Bitelic according to Simpletech's tech support team. They seem to be of good quality. The stock timings, or latency of the modules at 200Mhz is 2.5-3-3-8. Even at 166Mhz, the supported timings are 2-3-3-7. I am happy to say that I was able to run this set at 200Mhz at 2-2-2-5 timings stable. That's tighter timings than the SPD reports for the 166Mhz frequency. Quite impressive as these are very aggressive timings, even at slower speeds. Unfortunately, the more aggressive timings did not increase performance as thought. Running this set at 2-2-2-5 timings resulted in slightly lower benchmark scores when using SiSoft Sandra 2004. The biggest difference comes from the configuration of the ram as far as single or dual channel mode.
Here we can compare the difference in performance between single-channel and dual-channel in the same exact system. I used SiSoft Sandra 2004 to perform the memory bandwidth benchmarks.
Single Channel Mode - SiSoft Sandra 2004
As you can see, we hit scores of 2235 and 2236 in single-channel mode.
Dual Channel Mode - SiSoft Sandra 2004
Here we can see the scores jumped to 5528 and 5446, no other changes except that the memory is now configured in dual-channel mode. Now you can see why I was so determined to get these running in dual-channel mode! What a difference!
|
