The CPU used in this test is AMD's XP2000+ which operates at 1667MHz. To cool this processor, we used the Volcano 6Cu for comparison with the CP-101. The Volcano 6Cu is an all aluminum design with a copper base and has been qualified for use up to an Athlon XP2700+. The 6Cu's cooling fan runs at 4550 RPM. Both heatsinks were tested using Silver Thermal Compound at the interface.

You definitely know that through SEO, your business will benefit hugely, so you have to make sure to find the right Link Building Company that can help you gain your goals SEO on lookup motor rankings, finding the best Link Building Company for your business is a lot more crucial than ever. Link building Company will help you | Simple Website Templates. Every great website and web design needs a starting place or point. Our own newly redesigned website started from a basic template that was heavily modified to suit our needs and the same can be done for you. Using our simple sea website templates on our site you can buy website templates

The CP-101 operates at a higher temperature than the Volcano 6Cu according to the temperatures displayed in the BIOS. The Surface temperatures are very close with only 1°C separating the two. There is a great disparity seen in the on-die temperatures though, which is the most crucial temperature to watch.

Under Windows, we see very little difference in the CP-101 and the Volcano 6Cu. At this point, it is becoming quite clear that the liquid cooling solution in the Blue Ice setup is more for looks than performance.

As we tested the CP-101, it became rather apparent it was taking a lengthy amount of time for the system to cool back down after a load was placed on the CPU. So much so, we decided to test the differences in the time it was taking. The results were heavily in favor of the Volcano 6Cu. The CP-101 took almost twice as long to return to the normal idle temperatures for the CPU.

As you can see from the various issues we have discussed, the CP-101 is in need of some work. As far as the Socket A platform is concerned, this product should not be considered without the aid of a shim. The idea behind this product could be improved upon by making a separate product for the Socket A and the Socket 478. By trying to make the same product work for both platforms, Socket A users will suffer to the point of possibly destroying the core of their Athlon CPU's.

Regarding performance, the CP-101 was within 1°C of our Volcano cooler in the Windows tests. Our main concern was the length of time required for the return to idle temperatures after testing. In addition, the difference in the on-die temperatures displayed in the BIOS contributed to our reservations over the CP-101.

The CP-101 is a wonderful idea and a liquid cooling solution in one small package certainly deserves attention. Unfortunately, the idea does not perform as one would expect on the Socket A platform. If Aguatec decides to make a CP-201 specifically for the Socket A, I hope that we can get our hands one. This is a great idea we would love to see improved upon.